Skip to content
AdminKit

Best free TLS-RPT checkers

AdminKit's TLS-RPT check reads a domain's `_smtp._tls` DNS record for free, no account, and reads back its real `rua` report destination, telling the three states apart: published, published with no destination, or not published; MxToolbox and EasyDMARC each run a similar free existence/validity check, per their own pages, and Hardenize's bundled report reads back the destination too.

AdminKit is built by Netbase JSC. AdminKit is listed below; MxToolbox, EasyDMARC and Hardenize are independent and not affiliated with AdminKit.

What each tool’s own page confirms

MxToolbox’s TLSRPT Lookup, read 2026-11-07, states: “The free SMTP TLSRPT Policy check will check if a domain has enabled SMTP TLS Reporting — a way for email servers to share secure-delivery success and error reports.” No account or pricing is stated as required to run it.

EasyDMARC’s TLS-RPT Record Checker, read 2026-11-07, is listed under EasyDMARC’s free tools and lets you “learn if you have the TLS-RPT TXT record published in your DNS,” validating “the record syntax” against the policy specification and explaining “how to fix your domain’s TLS-RPT record in case it’s invalid.” EasyDMARC also runs a separate TLS-RPT Record Generator for building a new record, a tool AdminKit’s checker does not offer.

Hardenize’s public report, read 2026-11-07, checks TLS-RPT as one section — “SMTP TLS Reporting” — inside a much larger free, no-sign-in domain-security report covering DNS, DNSSEC, CAA, TLS certificates, STARTTLS, SPF, DMARC, DANE and web security headers on the same page. For its own domain, that section reads back the actual configured destination (“mailto:[email protected]”) and concludes “Good. Your TLS-RPT policy is valid.” — a similar depth of result to AdminKit’s, just bundled with everything else rather than a single-purpose tool.

AdminKit’s TLS-RPT check looks up the _smtp._tls.<domain> TXT record defined in RFC 8460 and reads back the rua destination it declares, distinguishing three outcomes on its own tool page: not published (no record), published, but no ‘rua’ destination (a record exists but can’t deliver reports), and a working published record with a destination. Neither MxToolbox’s nor EasyDMARC’s own pages state that same three-way distinction — their own wording describes checking whether a record exists and is syntactically valid, which is a related but narrower claim.

Do MxToolbox’s and EasyDMARC’s free tools show the actual rua destination they found?

Their own pages don’t say either way. MxToolbox’s and EasyDMARC’s own pages don’t state whether their result screen displays the specific rua address or URL it parsed out of the record — only that they check for the record’s existence and validity. This page marks that row unverified (dash) for both rather than assuming either way, the same honesty convention used throughout AdminKit’s other roundups.

The honest angle

If you want a single TLS-RPT check bundled with a full DNS/TLS/web/email security report, Hardenize’s own report covers the most ground in one page, and it’s one of the only tools checked here whose own report demonstrably reads back the actual destination address. If you want to both check an existing record and generate a new one on the same site, EasyDMARC offers both as separate free tools. If you just need a quick existence/validity read inside a wider mail-diagnostic toolset, MxToolbox’s lookup does that. AdminKit’s TLS-RPT check is a dedicated, free, no-account check that reads back the destination and separates the no-destination case from the no-record case explicitly on its own result — a check TLS-RPT is usually deployed alongside MTA-STS, so see the best free MTA-STS checkers roundup for the matching policy record.

TLS-RPT is part of AdminKit’s email authentication cluster, alongside MTA-STS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC and BIMI — see the TLS-RPT glossary entry for what the record itself does.


Trademarks belong to their respective owners; AdminKit is not affiliated with MxToolbox, Inc., EasyDMARC, or Hardenize.

AdminKit vs MxToolbox

Free TLS-RPT record checker, no account required

AdminKit ✓
MxToolbox ✓

Reads back the actual 'rua' report destination (mailto or https) the record declares

AdminKit ✓
MxToolbox —

Tells 'no record published' apart from 'record published, but no destination'

AdminKit ✓
MxToolbox —

Also offers a TLS-RPT record generator/builder on the same site

AdminKit ✗
MxToolbox —

AdminKit vs EasyDMARC

Free TLS-RPT record checker, no account required

AdminKit ✓
EasyDMARC ✓

Reads back the actual 'rua' report destination (mailto or https) the record declares

AdminKit ✓
EasyDMARC —

Tells 'no record published' apart from 'record published, but no destination'

AdminKit ✓
EasyDMARC —

Also offers a TLS-RPT record generator/builder on the same site

AdminKit ✗
EasyDMARC ✓

AdminKit vs Hardenize

Free TLS-RPT record checker, no account required

AdminKit ✓
Hardenize ✓

Reads back the actual 'rua' report destination (mailto or https) the record declares

AdminKit ✓
Hardenize ✓

Tells 'no record published' apart from 'record published, but no destination'

AdminKit ✓
Hardenize —

Part of one combined free DNS + TLS + web + email security report, not a single-purpose TLS-RPT tool

AdminKit —
Hardenize ✓

Also offers a TLS-RPT record generator/builder on the same site

AdminKit ✗
Hardenize —

Frequently asked questions

Does this page rank MxToolbox, EasyDMARC and Hardenize from best to worst, with AdminKit first?

No. AdminKit is listed alongside the other three tools, not placed first by default. The table below states only what each tool's own page confirms: a dedicated existence/validity check (MxToolbox, EasyDMARC), a bundled report that reads back the actual destination (Hardenize), and AdminKit's own dedicated check, which also reads back the destination and names the empty-destination case separately. Which one fits depends on what you need, not a single ranking.

Does AdminKit's TLS-RPT check tell a missing record apart from a record with no report destination?

Yes — AdminKit's own tool page describes three distinct outcomes: not published (no `_smtp._tls` record at all), published, but no 'rua' destination (a record exists but can't actually deliver any reports), and published (a working destination is declared). None of the other tools' own pages checked here describe that same three-way distinction; MxToolbox's and EasyDMARC's pages describe checking whether a record exists and is valid, without stating that distinction in those terms.

Do MxToolbox's and EasyDMARC's free TLS-RPT tools show the actual mailto or https destination they found?

Their own pages don't say either way. MxToolbox's TLSRPT Lookup page states it "will check if a domain has enabled SMTP TLS Reporting," and EasyDMARC's TLS-RPT Record Checker states it lets you "learn if you have the TLS-RPT TXT record published" and validates its syntax — neither page's own description confirms whether the result screen displays the specific `rua` address or URL it parsed out, so this page marks that row unverified for both rather than assuming either way.

Does Hardenize's report check TLS-RPT the same way AdminKit does?

Hardenize checks it as one section inside a much larger free domain-security report, not as a single-purpose TLS-RPT tool. Its own report for hardenize.com, read 2026-11-07, shows a dedicated "SMTP TLS Reporting" section that reads back the actual configured destination (quoting the `mailto:` address it found) and a plain-language verdict ("Good. Your TLS-RPT policy is valid."). That's a similar depth of result to AdminKit's, bundled with DNS, TLS, web-security and other email checks on the same page.

Is EasyDMARC's TLS-RPT Record Generator the same tool as its TLS-RPT checker?

No, they're two separate tools on EasyDMARC's own site: the TLS-RPT Record Checker reads and validates an existing record, while the TLS-RPT Record Generator builds the TXT record text for a domain that doesn't have one yet. AdminKit's TLS-RPT check only reads and verifies an existing record; it does not generate one.

Does this page use any competitor's logo or brand assets?

No. Every name here is used only to identify and compare publicly available tools (nominative use). AdminKit is not affiliated with or endorsed by MxToolbox, Inc., EasyDMARC or Hardenize.

Want AdminKit to watch this for you?

Free checks tell you the state today. Protective DNS and monitoring tell you when it changes.